Validation of assessment tools

The second half can be addressed through post-assessment validation. To check if your assessments meet the first half of Clause 1. On the other hand, you can only check if your assessment methods follow the Principles of Assessment and the Rules of Evidence after you have conducted assessments. Click here to read more about post-assessment validation. Before we can check the reliability and validity of assessment tools, we must first know what tools to validate.

These are usually made up of the following:. Check the student workbook for its suitability as an assessment tool. If multiple versions of the workbook exist, check the one that your students are currently using. The marking guide must have proper benchmarks for all assessment items. It must also give additional instructions to assessors whenever necessary.

The mapping document shows which assessment items address which unit requirements. These items should be in either the student workbook, the marking guide, or a separate assessment resource. Additional resources, like reading materials, checklists, registers, etc. Validate them to make sure they are appropriate for the assessment and sufficient. A good assessment tool must be able to meet all these requirements. Your validator must look at each assessment item to see if they can collectively draw evidence of the required knowledge and skills from a student.

This is, however, not always the case. Finally, we hope to see more frequent and more explicit use of the interpretation-use argument. As noted above, this initial step is difficult but vitally important to meaningful validation. Norcini J, Burch V. Med Teach. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education.

Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. The use of clinical simulations in assessment. Med Educ.

Research regarding methods of assessing learning outcomes. Simul Healthc. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. Technology-enabled assessment of health professions education: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference. Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality.

Kane MT. In: Brennan RL, editor. Educational measurement. Westport: Praeger; Google Scholar. When assessment data are words: validity evidence for qualitative educational assessments.

Epub ahead of print: Apr 5. Barry MJ. Screening for prostate cancer—the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med. Moyer VA. Screening for prostate cancer: U. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: a review of current evidence.

Artino AR, Jr. Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled?

Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med. Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Messick S. In: Linn RL, editor. Association AER. Standards for educational and psychological testing. What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment.

Adv Health Sci Educ. Article Google Scholar. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.

Am J Med. Cook DA, Lineberry M. Consequences validity evidence: evaluating the impact of educational assessments. Moss PA. The role of consequences in validity theory. Educ Meas Issues Pract. Haertel E. How is testing supposed to improve schooling? Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. J Educ Meas. Cook DA. When I say… validity. Br J Surg. Surgical crisis management skills training and assessment: a simulation-based approach to enhancing operating room performance.

Ann Surg. Competence of new emergency medicine residents in the performance of lumbar punctures. Acad Emerg Med. Are two heads better than one? Comparing dyad and self-regulated learning in simulation training. Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training. Competence and retention in performance of the lumbar puncture procedure in a task trainer model.

Transfer of simulated lumbar puncture training to the clinical setting. Pediatr Emerg Care. Assessing cardiac physical examination skills using simulation technology and real patients: a comparison study. Development and validation of a cardiac findings checklist for use with simulator-based assessments of cardiac physical examination competence.

Simulation-based objective assessment discerns clinical proficiency in central line placement: a construct validation. Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery FLS program as an assessment tool: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. Much ado about differences: why expert-novice comparisons add little to the validity argument.

Epub ahead of print Sep Brennan RL. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and applications. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press; Downing SM, Yudkowsky R.

Assessment in health professions education. New York, NY: Routledge; Clinical problem-solving by medical students: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Norman GR. The glass is a little full—of something: revisiting the issue of content specificity of problem solving. Scylla or Charybdis? Can we navigate between objectification and judgement in assessment? A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment.

Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Assessment: do we need to broaden our methodological horizons? Govaerts M, van der Vleuten CP. Validity in work-based assessment: expanding our horizons.

Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. High-value, cost-conscious medical education. JAMA Pediatr. A plea for new psychometric models in educational assessment. Face validity of assessments: faith-based interpretations or evidence-based science? Download references. DAC drafted the initial manuscript, and both authors revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version.

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Correspondence to David A. Reprints and Permissions. Cook, D. Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond.

Adv Simul 1, 31 Download citation. Received : 20 July Accepted : 16 November Published : 07 December Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search all BMC articles Search. Download PDF. Methodology article Open Access Published: 07 December Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond David A.

Abstract Background Simulation plays a vital role in health professions assessment. Key principles Validation refers to the process of collecting validity evidence to evaluate the appropriateness of the interpretations, uses, and decisions based on assessment results. Conclusions Rigorous validation first prioritizes and then empirically evaluates key assumptions in the interpretation and use of assessment scores.

Good assessment is important; simulation can help Educators, administrators, researchers, policymakers, and even the lay public recognize the importance of assessing health professionals. Validation is a process Validation refers to the process of collecting validity evidence to evaluate the appropriateness of the interpretations, uses, and decisions based on assessment results [ 10 ].

Why is assessment validation important? What do we mean by validity evidence? Table 1 The classical validity framework Full size table. Table 2 The five sources of evidence validity framework Full size table.

Table 3 The validation inferences validity framework Full size table. Skip to content Section 3: Assessing Validating assessment tools. Home Section 3: Assessing. Section 1: Training Overview and contents Principles of adult learning Identifying training objectives Elements of a training session Choosing the method of delivery Delivering a presentation Hints for training workers Reviewing your training.

Section 4: Supporting Overview and contents The learning environment Work health and safety Facilitating workplace learning Language, literacy and numeracy Workplace mentoring Working ethically. When to validate assessment tools. Next: Section 4: Supporting.